Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams vs. Bang & Olufsen Beoplay Portal

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Detailed comparison and review of Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams and Bang & Olufsen Beoplay Portal. With our comprehensive overview, you can simply compare design, sound quality, but also other key features of both headphones and easily decide which ones are the right choice for you. Our goal is to help you identify the main differences between products and find the headphones that best fit your needs and expectations.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams vs. Bang & Olufsen Beoplay Portal Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams Bang & Olufsen Beoplay Portal
Product Type Headset - Bluetooth - wireless - USB-C via Bluetooth adapter Headphones - Bluetooth / 2.4 GHz radio frequency - wireless, wired - 3.5 mm jack, USB-C
Height - 17.87 cm
Width - 16.73 cm
Depth - 9.26 cm
Weight 150 g 282 g Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams are lighter than Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams headphones.
Colour - Navy | Antracite black | Grey mist
Body Material - Aluminium, rubber, composite polymer, bamboo fibre cloth
Earpad Material - Memory foam, lambskin
Design - Games
Recommended Use - Game console, portable electronics, computer
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 30 m 12 m Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams have a greater operating distance than Bang & Olufsen Beoplay Portal.
SOUND QUALITY Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams Bang & Olufsen Beoplay Portal
Headphones Form Factor On-ear Full size
Headphones Technology - Dynamic
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless, wired
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth / 2.4 GHz radio frequency
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 5.1 Bang & Olufsen Beoplay Portal have a more advanced version of Bluetooth than Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams.
Bluetooth Profiles Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) -
Bluetooth Audio Codec SBC, mSBC SBC, AAC, aptX
Active Noise Cancelling - Yes Bang & Olufsen Beoplay Portal are equipped with active noice cancellation.
Active Noise Cancelling Technology - Adaptive Noise Cancellation
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Built-in Decoders - Dolby Atmos
Frequency Response 20 - 20000 Hz 20 - 22000 Hz Bang & Olufsen Beoplay Portal offer a larger frequency range than Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams.
Sensitivity - 95 dB/mW
Impedance 32 Ohm 24 Ohm
Diaphragm 32 mm 40 mm Bang & Olufsen Beoplay Portal have a thicker diaphragm than Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams.
Magnet Material - Neodymium
Features SoundGuard DIGITAL Technology Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair
MICROPHONE Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams Bang & Olufsen Beoplay Portal
Form Factor Headset microphone Built-in
Type Boom -
Microphone Operation Mode Uni-directional -
Microphones Included 2 -
REMOTE CONTROL Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams Bang & Olufsen Beoplay Portal
Controls Mute, volume, answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track, reject call, redial, voice assistant Power on/off, volume control, microphone on/mute, play/pause, ANC/transparency
CABLE Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams Bang & Olufsen Beoplay Portal
Cable Type - USB-C to USB-A cable - detachable - 1.25 m
Headphones cable - detachable - 1.25 m
Cable Length - 1.25 m
FEATURES Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams Bang & Olufsen Beoplay Portal
Features Voice alerts -
Internet of Things (IoT) Compatible Yes -
Intelligent Assistant Alexa -
Additional Functions - Transparency mode
BATTERY AND CHARGING Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams Bang & Olufsen Beoplay Portal
Battery Type Headset battery rechargeable - lithium polymer Headphone battery rechargeable - Lithium Ion
Battery Capacity 360 mAh 1200 mAh Bang & Olufsen Beoplay Portal have a higher battery capacity than Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams.
Battery Life 15 hour(s) 24 hour(s) Bang & Olufsen Beoplay Portal lasts longer on a single charge than the Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams.
Battery Life Details Continuous playback: up to 15 hours
Continuous talk: up to 12 hours
Continuous playback (active noise-cancelling on) (2.4 GHz / Bluetooth): up to 12 hours
Continuous playback (active noise-cancelling on) (Bluetooth ON): up to 24 hours
Standby Time 312 hours -
Charging Time 1.5 hour(s) 3 hour(s) Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams recharge faster than Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams.
CONNECTIONS Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams Bang & Olufsen Beoplay Portal
Connector Type Wireless adapter (USB Type-C) Headphones (mini-phone 3.5mm)
USB (24 pin USB-C)
OTHERS Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams Bang & Olufsen Beoplay Portal
Included Accessories Bluetooth USB-C adapter Inflight adapter
Compliant Standards - MFI
Service & Support - Limited warranty - 3 years
Other Comparisons with Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Other Comparisons with Bang & Olufsen Beoplay Portal
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: