Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams vs. ASUS TUF Gaming H3 Wireless

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Detailed comparison and review of Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams and ASUS TUF Gaming H3 Wireless. With our comprehensive overview, you can simply compare design, sound quality, but also other key features of both headphones and easily decide which ones are the right choice for you. Our goal is to help you identify the main differences between products and find the headphones that best fit your needs and expectations.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams vs. ASUS TUF Gaming H3 Wireless Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams ASUS TUF Gaming H3 Wireless
Product Type Headset - Bluetooth - wireless - USB-C via Bluetooth adapter Headset - 2.4 GHz - wireless
Weight 150 g 307 g Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams are lighter than Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams headphones.
Colour - Gun metal
Earpad Material - Memory foam, protein-leather
Headband Material - Stainless steel
Recommended Use - Game console, phone, computer
Gaming - Yes
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 30 m 25 m Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams have a greater operating distance than ASUS TUF Gaming H3 Wireless.
SOUND QUALITY Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams ASUS TUF Gaming H3 Wireless
Headphones Form Factor On-ear Full size
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth 2.4 GHz radio frequency
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 5.0 -
Bluetooth Profiles Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) -
Bluetooth Audio Codec SBC, mSBC -
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Sound Effects - 7.1 Channel Virtual Surround Sound
Frequency Response 20 - 20000 Hz 20 - 20000 Hz Both headphones offer the same frequency response.
Impedance 32 Ohm 32 Ohm
Diaphragm 32 mm 50 mm ASUS TUF Gaming H3 Wireless have a thicker diaphragm than Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams.
Magnet Material - Neodymium
Features SoundGuard DIGITAL Technology -
MICROPHONE Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams ASUS TUF Gaming H3 Wireless
Form Factor Headset microphone Headset microphone
Type Boom Boom
Microphone Operation Mode Uni-directional Uni-directional
Frequency Response - 50 - 10000 Hz
Audio Input Details - Uni-directional - 50 - 10000 Hz
Sensitivity - -40 dB
Sensitivity Margin - +/- 3dB
Microphones Included 2 -
REMOTE CONTROL Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams ASUS TUF Gaming H3 Wireless
Controls Mute, volume, answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track, reject call, redial, voice assistant Volume, microphone on/mute
CABLE Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams ASUS TUF Gaming H3 Wireless
Cable Type - USB charge cable
USB-C to USB 2.0 adapter
FEATURES Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams ASUS TUF Gaming H3 Wireless
Features Voice alerts -
Internet of Things (IoT) Compatible Yes -
Intelligent Assistant Alexa -
BATTERY AND CHARGING Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams ASUS TUF Gaming H3 Wireless
Battery Type Headset battery rechargeable - lithium polymer Headset battery rechargeable
Battery Capacity 360 mAh -
Battery Life 15 hour(s) 15 hour(s) Both headphones last the same amount of time on a single charge.
Battery Life Details Continuous playback: up to 15 hours
Continuous talk: up to 12 hours
-
Standby Time 312 hours -
Charging Time 1.5 hour(s) -
WIRELESS LINK Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams ASUS TUF Gaming H3 Wireless
Radio Frequency Range - 2.4GHz
CONNECTIONS Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams ASUS TUF Gaming H3 Wireless
Connector Type Wireless adapter (USB Type-C) -
OTHERS Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams ASUS TUF Gaming H3 Wireless
Included Accessories Bluetooth USB-C adapter USB-C wireless transmitter
Other Comparisons with Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Other Comparisons with ASUS TUF Gaming H3 Wireless
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: