Xiaomi MI Sport vs. ifrogz AirTime

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Side by side comparison and review of Xiaomi MI Sport and ifrogz AirTime. Compare design, sound quality and other key specifications and features to simplify the choice of your perfect headphones. Our goal is to make it easier for you to decide on the headphones that will best meet your expectations by revealing the main differences between the products.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Xiaomi MI Sport vs. ifrogz AirTime Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Xiaomi MI Sport ifrogz AirTime
Product Type Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless True wireless earphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Weight 17.8 g 51.02 g Xiaomi MI Sport are lighter than Xiaomi MI Sport headphones.
Colour Black | White Black | White | Blue
Protection Sweat-resistant, water-resistant Sweat-resistant, IPX4
Design Sports -
Recommended Use Portable electronics Portable electronics
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 10 m -
SOUND QUALITY Xiaomi MI Sport ifrogz AirTime
Headphones Form Factor In-ear - over-the-ear mount In-ear
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 4.1 -
Sound Output Mode - Stereo
Frequency Response - 20 - 20000 Hz
Sensitivity - 96 dB
Impedance - 32 Ohm
Diaphragm - 8 mm
Magnet Material - Neodymium
MICROPHONE Xiaomi MI Sport ifrogz AirTime
Form Factor - Built-in
BATTERY AND CHARGING Xiaomi MI Sport ifrogz AirTime
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable Headphone battery rechargeable
Battery Capacity 100 mAh -
Battery Life 7 hour(s) 15 hour(s) ifrogz AirTime lasts longer on a single charge than the Xiaomi MI Sport.
Standby Time 280 hours -
Charging Time - 1.5 hour(s)
OTHERS Xiaomi MI Sport ifrogz AirTime
Included Accessories 5 pairs of ear tips 3 pairs of ear tips, charging case, micro-USB charging cable
Service & Support - Limited warranty - 2 years
Other projects: