Skullcandy Method BT Sport vs. ifrogz intone wireless

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Side by side comparison and review of Skullcandy Method BT Sport and ifrogz intone wireless. Compare design, sound quality and other key specifications and features to simplify the choice of your perfect headphones. Our goal is to make it easier for you to decide on the headphones that will best meet your expectations by revealing the main differences between the products.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Skullcandy Method BT Sport vs. ifrogz intone wireless Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Skullcandy Method BT Sport ifrogz intone wireless
Product Type Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Colour Navy blue | Black, mint Black | White
Protection Sweat-resistant Sweat-resistant
Recommended Use Portable electronics Portable electronics
SOUND QUALITY Skullcandy Method BT Sport ifrogz intone wireless
Headphones Form Factor Ear-bud - behind-the-neck mount Ear-bud
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Sound Output Mode - Stereo
Frequency Response - 20 - 20000 Hz
Sensitivity - 98 dB
Impedance - 32 Ohm
Diaphragm - 14 mm
MICROPHONE Skullcandy Method BT Sport ifrogz intone wireless
Form Factor - Built-in
REMOTE CONTROL Skullcandy Method BT Sport ifrogz intone wireless
Controls Volume control, answer/end, next/previous track Volume, play/pause, next/previous track
BATTERY AND CHARGING Skullcandy Method BT Sport ifrogz intone wireless
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable Headphone battery rechargeable
Battery Life 9 hour(s) 5 hours Skullcandy Method BT Sport lasts longer on a single charge than the ifrogz intone wireless.
Charging Time - 1 hour
Other projects: