Skullcandy Indy Evo vs. Bang & Olufsen Beoplay EQ

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

In depth comparison and review of Skullcandy Indy Evo and Bang & Olufsen Beoplay EQ. Compare design, audio features, functions and other important specifications to easily choose the right headphones for you. Our goal is to help you uncover differences between the products and find the headphones that will best fit your needs.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Skullcandy Indy Evo vs. Bang & Olufsen Beoplay EQ Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Skullcandy Indy Evo Bang & Olufsen Beoplay EQ
Product Type True wireless earphones - Bluetooth - wireless True wireless earphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Height 2.46 cm 2.2 cm
Width 4.6 cm 2.4 cm
Depth 2.17 cm 2.7 cm
Weight 57 g 8 g Bang & Olufsen Beoplay EQ are lighter than Skullcandy Indy Evo headphones.
Dimensions & Weight Details Case: 57 g Charging case: 7.7 cm x 2.6 cm x 4 cm / 50 g
Earbud: 2.4 cm x 2.7 cm x 2.2 cm / 8 g
Colour Carefree yellow | Lucky purple | Centered champagne | Chill grey | 92 blue | Collina Strada | True black | Wild orange Black
Body Material - Aluminium, silicone, polymer
Protection Dust-resistant, sweat-resistant, water-resistant Splashproof, dust-resistant, sweat-resistant, IP54
Recommended Use Portable electronics Portable electronics
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 30 m -
SOUND QUALITY Skullcandy Indy Evo Bang & Olufsen Beoplay EQ
Headphones Form Factor In-ear In-ear
Headphones Technology - Dynamic
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 5.2 Bang & Olufsen Beoplay EQ have a more advanced version of Bluetooth than Skullcandy Indy Evo.
Bluetooth Audio Codec SBC, AAC SBC, AAC, aptX
Active Noise Cancelling - Yes Bang & Olufsen Beoplay EQ are equipped with active noice cancellation.
Active Noise Cancelling Technology - Adaptive Noise Cancelling
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Frequency Response 20 - 20000 Hz 20 - 20000 Hz Both headphones offer the same frequency response.
Max Input Power 10 mW -
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) <3% -
Sensitivity - 107 dB
Impedance 32 Ohm 17 Ohm
Max Sound Pressure 105 dB -
Diaphragm 6 mm 6.88 mm Bang & Olufsen Beoplay EQ have a thicker diaphragm than Skullcandy Indy Evo.
Magnet Material NdFeB -
Features Built-in Tile Tracker -
MICROPHONE Skullcandy Indy Evo Bang & Olufsen Beoplay EQ
Form Factor Built-in Built-in
Microphone Operation Mode - Omni-directional
Microphones Included - 6
REMOTE CONTROL Skullcandy Indy Evo Bang & Olufsen Beoplay EQ
Controls Volume control, answer/end, next/previous track, voice assistant -
CABLE Skullcandy Indy Evo Bang & Olufsen Beoplay EQ
Cable Type USB-C charge cable USB-C to USB-A cable - 50 cm
FEATURES Skullcandy Indy Evo Bang & Olufsen Beoplay EQ
Features Touch control -
Internet of Things (IoT) Compatible Yes -
Intelligent Assistant Siri, Google Assistant -
BATTERY AND CHARGING Skullcandy Indy Evo Bang & Olufsen Beoplay EQ
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable - lithium polymer Headphone battery rechargeable
Battery Capacity 40 mAh 85 mAh Bang & Olufsen Beoplay EQ have a higher battery capacity than Skullcandy Indy Evo.
Battery Life 6 hour(s) 7.5 hour(s) Bang & Olufsen Beoplay EQ lasts longer on a single charge than the Skullcandy Indy Evo.
Battery Life Details Continuous playback (with included charging case): up to 30 hours
Continuous playback: up to 6 hours
Continuous playback (with included charging case): up to 20 hours
Continuous playback (noise cancelling ON): up to 6.5 hours
Continuous playback (noise cancelling OFF): up to 7.5 hours
Charging Time 1 hour(s) 1.5 hour(s) Skullcandy Indy Evo recharge faster than Skullcandy Indy Evo.
Included Qty 2 -
OTHERS Skullcandy Indy Evo Bang & Olufsen Beoplay EQ
Included Accessories 3 pairs of gel ear tips, charging case (500 mAh), 2 pairs of stability gels (small, large) 4 pairs of silicone ear tips (extra small, small, medium, large), Comply ear tips, charging case (340 mAh)
Compliant Standards IP55 -
Service & Support Limited warranty - 2 years -
Other projects: