Samsung U Flex EO-BG950 vs. Poly Voyager 4210-M

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Detailed comparison and review of Samsung U Flex EO-BG950 and Poly Voyager 4210-M. With our comprehensive overview, you can simply compare design, sound quality, but also other key features of both headphones and easily decide which ones are the right choice for you. Our goal is to help you identify the main differences between products and find the headphones that best fit your needs and expectations.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Samsung U Flex EO-BG950 vs. Poly Voyager 4210-M Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Samsung U Flex EO-BG950 Poly Voyager 4210-M
Product Type Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless Headset - wired - USB-C
Series - Voyager 4200 series
Weight 51 g -
Colour Ivory -
Recommended Use Portable electronics -
SOUND QUALITY Samsung U Flex EO-BG950 Poly Voyager 4210-M
Headphones Form Factor In-ear -
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wired
Wireless Technology Bluetooth -
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 4.2 -
Bluetooth Profiles Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) -
Sound Output Mode Stereo -
REMOTE CONTROL Samsung U Flex EO-BG950 Poly Voyager 4210-M
Controls Mute, answer/end, reject call -
CABLE Samsung U Flex EO-BG950 Poly Voyager 4210-M
Cable Type USB charge cable -
BATTERY AND CHARGING Samsung U Flex EO-BG950 Poly Voyager 4210-M
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable -
Battery Life 10 hour(s) -
Standby Time 250 hours -
CONNECTIONS Samsung U Flex EO-BG950 Poly Voyager 4210-M
Connector Type Bluetooth
USB
USB (USB Type-C)
OTHERS Samsung U Flex EO-BG950 Poly Voyager 4210-M
Included Accessories 3 pairs of ear tips (small, medium, large) Charging stand, Bluetooth dongle
Software Certification - Certified for Microsoft Teams
Other projects: