ROCCAT Renga vs. AKG K92

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Detailed comparison and review of ROCCAT Renga and AKG K92. With our comprehensive overview, you can simply compare design, sound quality, but also other key features of both headphones and easily decide which ones are the right choice for you. Our goal is to help you identify the main differences between products and find the headphones that best fit your needs and expectations.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

ROCCAT Renga vs. AKG K92 Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS ROCCAT Renga AKG K92
Product Type Headset - wired Headphones - wired - 3.5 mm jack
Height 20 cm -
Width 21 cm -
Depth 10 cm -
Weight 210 g 200 g AKG K92 are lighter than ROCCAT Renga headphones.
Colour - Matte black
Earpad Material - Leatherette
Recommended Use Game console, computer Professional audio
SOUND QUALITY ROCCAT Renga AKG K92
Headphones Form Factor Full size Full size
Ear Cups Type - Closed
Connectivity Technology Wired Wired
Noise Isolating - Yes AKG K92 are equipped with a noise isolating function.
Sound Output Mode - Stereo
Frequency Response 20 - 20000 Hz 16 - 22000 Hz AKG K92 offer a larger frequency range than ROCCAT Renga.
Max Input Power - 200 mW
Sensitivity 110 dB 113 dB AKG K92 have higher sensitivity than ROCCAT Renga.
Impedance 32 Ohm 32 Ohm
Diaphragm 50 mm 40 mm ROCCAT Renga have a thicker diaphragm than AKG K92.
Magnet Material Neodymium -
In-Cord Volume Control Yes -
MICROPHONE ROCCAT Renga AKG K92
Type Boom -
Microphone Operation Mode Omni-directional -
Sensitivity -52 dB -
Impedance 2.2 kOhm -
REMOTE CONTROL ROCCAT Renga AKG K92
Controls Volume, microphone on/off -
CABLE ROCCAT Renga AKG K92
Cable Type Headset cable - 2.5 m Headphones cable - 3 m
Cable Length 2.5 m -
CONNECTIONS ROCCAT Renga AKG K92
Connector Type Headset (mini-phone stereo 3.5 mm 4-pole) Headphones (mini-phone stereo 3.5 mm)
OTHERS ROCCAT Renga AKG K92
Included Accessories - 3.5 mm to 6.3 mm adapter
Other projects: