In depth comparison and review of Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 505 and Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT. Compare design, audio features, functions and other important specifications to easily choose the right headphones for you. Our goal is to help you uncover differences between the products and find the headphones that will best fit your needs.
| DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 505 | Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT |
|---|
| Product Type | Headphones - Bluetooth - wireless | Headphones - Bluetooth - wireless | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 6.726 cm | - | |
| Width | 14.877 cm | - | |
| Depth | 17.155 cm | - | |
| Weight | 155 g | 195 g | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 505 are lighter than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 505 headphones. |
| Colour | Black | White | |
| Earpad Material | Memory foam | - | |
| Headband Material | Memory foam | - | |
| Protection | Moisture-resistant, sweat-resistant | - | |
| Recommended Use | Portable electronics | Portable electronics | |
| Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) | 10 m | 10 m | The maximum operating distance of both headphones is the same. |
| SOUND QUALITY | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 505 | Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT |
|---|
| Headphones Form Factor | On-ear | On-ear | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Headphones Technology | - | Dynamic | |
| Ear Cups Type | - | Closed | |
| Connectivity Technology | Wireless | Wireless | |
| Wireless Technology | Bluetooth | Bluetooth | |
| Bluetooth Version | Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 | Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT have a more advanced version of Bluetooth than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 505. |
| Bluetooth Profiles | Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) | Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) | |
| Sound Output Mode | Stereo | - | |
| Frequency Response | 50 - 20000 Hz | 20 - 20000 Hz | Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT offer a larger frequency range than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 505. |
| Max Input Power | - | 10 mW | |
| Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) | <3% | - | |
| Sensitivity | - | 102 dB | |
| Impedance | 32 Ohm | 32 Ohm | |
| Diaphragm | 40 mm | PET - 32 mm | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 505 have a thicker diaphragm than Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT. |
| Magnet Material | - | NdFeB |
| MICROPHONE | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 505 | Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT |
|---|
| Form Factor | Built-in | Built-in |
|---|
| REMOTE CONTROL | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 505 | Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT |
|---|
| Controls | Answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track | Volume control, answer/end |
|---|
| CABLE | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 505 | Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT |
|---|
| Cable Type | Micro-USB charge cable Audio cable |
USB power cable - detachable |
|---|
| BATTERY AND CHARGING | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 505 | Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT |
|---|
| Battery Type | Headphone battery rechargeable | Headphone battery rechargeable | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Life | 18 hour(s) | 15 hour(s) | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 505 lasts longer on a single charge than the Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT. |
| Battery Life Details | - | Continuous playback: up to 15 hours | |
| Standby Time | 480 hours | - | |
| Charging Time | 1.5 hour(s) | 3 hour(s) | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 505 recharge faster than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 505. |
| WIRELESS LINK | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 505 | Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT |
|---|
| Transmission Range | 10 m | - |
|---|
| CONNECTIONS | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 505 | Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT |
|---|
| Connector Type | - | USB (power only) Bluetooth |
|---|
cs
sk
de
it
es
fr
hu
pt
ru
pl
br
ro
