Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 vs. Erato Verse

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Side by side comparison and review of Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 and Erato Verse. Compare design, sound quality and other key specifications and features to simplify the choice of your perfect headphones. Our goal is to make it easier for you to decide on the headphones that will best meet your expectations by revealing the main differences between the products.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 vs. Erato Verse Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Erato Verse
Product Type Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless True wireless earphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Height - 2.55 cm
Width - 1.55 cm
Depth - 1.65 cm
Weight 14 g 4.5 g Erato Verse are lighter than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 headphones.
Dimensions & Weight Details - Charging case: 5.5 cm x 5.5 cm x 2.55 cm / 49 g
Colour Black | Dark blue | Coral | Lime green White | Black
Protection Sweat-resistant Dust-resistant, sweat-resistant, IPX5, water-resistant
Design Sports -
Recommended Use Portable electronics Portable electronics
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 10 m 10 m The maximum operating distance of both headphones is the same.
SOUND QUALITY Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Erato Verse
Headphones Form Factor In-ear In-ear
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 4.1 Bluetooth 4.2 Erato Verse have a more advanced version of Bluetooth than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305.
Bluetooth Profiles Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP)
Bluetooth Audio Codec - SBC, AAC
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Frequency Response 20 - 20000 Hz 20 - 20000 Hz Both headphones offer the same frequency response.
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) <3% -
Sensitivity 106 dB 98 dB Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 have higher sensitivity than Erato Verse.
Impedance 16 Ohm 16 Ohm
Diaphragm 6 mm 5.8 mm Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 have a thicker diaphragm than Erato Verse.
MICROPHONE Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Erato Verse
Form Factor - Built-in
Type On-cable -
Microphone Operation Mode - Omni-directional
Audio Input Details - Omni-directional
Sensitivity - -42 dB
REMOTE CONTROL Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Erato Verse
Controls Answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track Volume, power on/off, answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track, pair mode
CABLE Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Erato Verse
Cable Type Micro-USB charge cable Micro-USB charge cable
BATTERY AND CHARGING Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Erato Verse
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable Headphone battery rechargeable
Battery Life 6 hour(s) 4 hours Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 lasts longer on a single charge than the Erato Verse.
Battery Life Details - Continuous playback: up to 3 hours
Continuous talk: up to 4 hours
Standby Time 240 hours -
Charging Time 2 hour(s) -
OTHERS Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Erato Verse
Included Accessories Carrying pouch, 3 pairs of ear tips (small, medium, large) 3 pairs of ear tips (small, medium, large), charging case (800 mAh)
Other Comparisons with Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305
Other Comparisons with Erato Verse
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: