Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500CL vs. Under Armour Sport Wireless Heart Rate

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

In depth comparison and review of Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500CL and Under Armour Sport Wireless Heart Rate. Compare design, audio features, functions and other important specifications to easily choose the right headphones for you. Our goal is to help you uncover differences between the products and find the headphones that will best fit your needs.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500CL vs. Under Armour Sport Wireless Heart Rate Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500CL Under Armour Sport Wireless Heart Rate
Product Type Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Height 2 cm -
Width 10 cm -
Depth 4 cm -
Weight 14 g -
Colour Black, carbon lime Black
Body Material Rubber -
Protection Waterproof, sweat-resistant Sweat-resistant
Design Sports -
Recommended Use Portable electronics Portable electronics
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 10 m -
SOUND QUALITY Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500CL Under Armour Sport Wireless Heart Rate
Headphones Form Factor Ear-bud In-ear
Headphones Technology Dynamic Dynamic
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 4.1 Bluetooth 4.2 Under Armour Sport Wireless Heart Rate have a more advanced version of Bluetooth than Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500CL.
Bluetooth Profiles Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP)
Noise Isolating Yes - Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500CL are equipped with a noise isolating function.
Sound Output Mode - Stereo
Frequency Response 15 - 22000 Hz 10 - 22000 Hz Under Armour Sport Wireless Heart Rate offer a larger frequency range than Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500CL.
Max Input Power 10 mW -
Sensitivity 107 dB -
Impedance 32 Ohm -
Diaphragm PET - 13.6 mm 5.8 mm Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500CL have a thicker diaphragm than Under Armour Sport Wireless Heart Rate.
Magnet Material Neodymium -
In-Cord Volume Control - Yes
MICROPHONE Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500CL Under Armour Sport Wireless Heart Rate
Form Factor - Built-in
Type On-cable -
REMOTE CONTROL Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500CL Under Armour Sport Wireless Heart Rate
Controls Volume control, answer/end, hold, phone/music mode -
CABLE Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500CL Under Armour Sport Wireless Heart Rate
Cable Type Headphones cable - Kevlar reinforced
USB charge cable
Micro-USB cable
FEATURES Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500CL Under Armour Sport Wireless Heart Rate
Sensors - Heart rate
BATTERY AND CHARGING Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500CL Under Armour Sport Wireless Heart Rate
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable - lithium polymer Handset battery rechargeable - Lithium Ion
Battery Capacity - 50 mAh
Battery Life 4.5 hours 5 hour(s) Under Armour Sport Wireless Heart Rate lasts longer on a single charge than the Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500CL.
Battery Life Details Continuous playback: up to 4.5 hours
Standby: up to 55 hours
Continuous talk: up to 4.5 hours
-
Standby Time 55 hours -
Charging Time - 2 hour(s)
Included Qty - 2
WIRELESS LINK Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500CL Under Armour Sport Wireless Heart Rate
Transmission Range 10 m -
CONNECTIONS Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500CL Under Armour Sport Wireless Heart Rate
Connector Type Bluetooth
USB (power only)
-
OTHERS Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500CL Under Armour Sport Wireless Heart Rate
Included Accessories USB charge cable, 1 pair of ear tips Carrying case, 4 pairs of ear tips, micro-USB charging cable
Compliant Standards IPX2 -
Service & Support Limited warranty - 1 year -
Other Comparisons with Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500CL
Other Comparisons with Under Armour Sport Wireless Heart Rate
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: