Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500BL vs. Razer Hammerhead BT

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Side by side comparison and review of Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500BL and Razer Hammerhead BT. Compare design, sound quality and other key specifications and features to simplify the choice of your perfect headphones. Our goal is to make it easier for you to decide on the headphones that will best meet your expectations by revealing the main differences between the products.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500BL vs. Razer Hammerhead BT Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500BL Razer Hammerhead BT
Product Type Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Height 2 cm -
Width 10 cm -
Depth 4 cm -
Weight 14 g 28 g Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500BL are lighter than Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500BL headphones.
Body Material Rubber -
Protection Sweat-resistant -
Design Sports -
Recommended Use Portable electronics Portable electronics
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 10 m 10 m The maximum operating distance of both headphones is the same.
SOUND QUALITY Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500BL Razer Hammerhead BT
Headphones Form Factor Ear-bud In-ear
Headphones Technology Dynamic -
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 4.1 Bluetooth 4.1 Both headphones have the same Bluetooth version.
Bluetooth Profiles Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) -
Sound Output Mode - Stereo
Frequency Response 15 - 22000 Hz 20 - 20000 Hz Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500BL offer a larger frequency range than Razer Hammerhead BT.
Max Input Power 10 mW 10 mW
Sensitivity 107 dB 116 dB Razer Hammerhead BT have higher sensitivity than Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500BL.
Impedance 32 Ohm 32 Ohm
Diaphragm PET - 13.6 mm 10 mm Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500BL have a thicker diaphragm than Razer Hammerhead BT.
Magnet Material Neodymium Neodymium magnet
Features - Bluetooth aptX technology
In-Cord Volume Control - Yes
MICROPHONE Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500BL Razer Hammerhead BT
Type On-cable On-cable
Microphone Operation Mode - Omni-directional
Frequency Response - 300 - 3400 Hz
Sensitivity - -42 dB
Signal-To-Noise Ratio - 55 dB
REMOTE CONTROL Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500BL Razer Hammerhead BT
Controls Volume control, answer/end, hold, phone/music mode Volume, play/pause button, answer/end, next/previous track
CABLE Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500BL Razer Hammerhead BT
Cable Type - Headphones cable - 63 cm
Cable Length - 63 cm
BATTERY AND CHARGING Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500BL Razer Hammerhead BT
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable - lithium polymer Headphone battery lithium polymer
Battery Capacity 120 mAh 160 mAh Razer Hammerhead BT have a higher battery capacity than Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500BL.
Battery Life 4.5 hours 8 hour(s) Razer Hammerhead BT lasts longer on a single charge than the Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500BL.
Standby Time 55 hours -
Charging Time - 2 hour(s)
WIRELESS LINK Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500BL Razer Hammerhead BT
Transmission Range 10 m 10 m The transmission range of both headphones is the same.
CONNECTIONS Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500BL Razer Hammerhead BT
Connector Type Bluetooth -
OTHERS Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500BL Razer Hammerhead BT
Included Accessories USB cable, protective pouch -
Compatibility - iPhone, iPad, iPod, Android phone
Other Comparisons with Philips ActionFit RunFree SHQ6500BL
Other Comparisons with Razer Hammerhead BT
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: