JBL Everest 310 vs. ifrogz Aurora Wireless

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

In depth comparison and review of JBL Everest 310 and ifrogz Aurora Wireless. Compare design, audio features, functions and other important specifications to easily choose the right headphones for you. Our goal is to help you uncover differences between the products and find the headphones that will best fit your needs.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

JBL Everest 310 vs. ifrogz Aurora Wireless Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS JBL Everest 310 ifrogz Aurora Wireless
Product Type Headphones - Bluetooth - wireless Headphones - Bluetooth - wireless - 3.5 mm jack
Colour Gun metal Blue | Red | Black | White
Recommended Use Portable electronics -
SOUND QUALITY JBL Everest 310 ifrogz Aurora Wireless
Headphones Form Factor On-ear On-ear
Headphones Technology Dynamic -
Foldable Yes - JBL Everest 310 can be folded.
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Noise Isolating - Yes ifrogz Aurora Wireless are equipped with a noise isolating function.
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Frequency Response 10 - 22000 Hz -
Diaphragm 40 mm 40 mm Both headphones are designed with same thick diaphragm.
MICROPHONE JBL Everest 310 ifrogz Aurora Wireless
Form Factor Built-in Built-in
REMOTE CONTROL JBL Everest 310 ifrogz Aurora Wireless
Controls - Volume control, next/previous track
BATTERY AND CHARGING JBL Everest 310 ifrogz Aurora Wireless
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable Headphone battery rechargeable
Battery Life 20 hour(s) 12 hour(s) JBL Everest 310 lasts longer on a single charge than the ifrogz Aurora Wireless.
Charging Time 2 hour(s) -
CONNECTIONS JBL Everest 310 ifrogz Aurora Wireless
Connector Type Headphones (mini-phone 3.5 mm 4-pole) Headphones (mini-phone stereo 3.5 mm)
OTHERS JBL Everest 310 ifrogz Aurora Wireless
Included Accessories Carrying case, micro-USB charging cable -
Service & Support - Limited warranty - 2 years
Other projects: