JAM Transit Ultra vs. ifrogz Flex Arc

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Side by side comparison and review of JAM Transit Ultra and ifrogz Flex Arc. Compare design, sound quality and other key specifications and features to simplify the choice of your perfect headphones. Our goal is to make it easier for you to decide on the headphones that will best meet your expectations by revealing the main differences between the products.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

JAM Transit Ultra vs. ifrogz Flex Arc Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS JAM Transit Ultra ifrogz Flex Arc
Product Type Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Colour Black Black | White
Protection Sweat-resistant Sweat-resistant
Recommended Use - Portable electronics
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) - 10 m
SOUND QUALITY JAM Transit Ultra ifrogz Flex Arc
Headphones Form Factor In-ear In-ear - behind-the-neck mount
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 4.1 Bluetooth 4.1 Both headphones have the same Bluetooth version.
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Diaphragm - 8 mm
MICROPHONE JAM Transit Ultra ifrogz Flex Arc
Active Noise Cancelling - Yes
REMOTE CONTROL JAM Transit Ultra ifrogz Flex Arc
Controls Answer/end Volume, answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track
BATTERY AND CHARGING JAM Transit Ultra ifrogz Flex Arc
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable Headphone battery rechargeable
Battery Life 3 hour(s) 8 hour(s) ifrogz Flex Arc lasts longer on a single charge than the JAM Transit Ultra.
OTHERS JAM Transit Ultra ifrogz Flex Arc
Included Accessories 3 pairs of ear tips, USB charging cable, charging case -
Other projects: