ifrogz Flex Arc vs. Xiaomi MI Sport

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Detailed comparison and review of ifrogz Flex Arc and Xiaomi MI Sport. With our comprehensive overview, you can simply compare design, sound quality, but also other key features of both headphones and easily decide which ones are the right choice for you. Our goal is to help you identify the main differences between products and find the headphones that best fit your needs and expectations.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

ifrogz Flex Arc vs. Xiaomi MI Sport Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS ifrogz Flex Arc Xiaomi MI Sport
Product Type Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Weight - 17.8 g
Colour Black | White Black | White
Protection Sweat-resistant Sweat-resistant, water-resistant
Design - Sports
Recommended Use Portable electronics Portable electronics
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 10 m 10 m The maximum operating distance of both headphones is the same.
SOUND QUALITY ifrogz Flex Arc Xiaomi MI Sport
Headphones Form Factor In-ear - behind-the-neck mount In-ear - over-the-ear mount
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 4.1 Bluetooth 4.1 Both headphones have the same Bluetooth version.
Sound Output Mode Stereo -
Diaphragm 8 mm -
MICROPHONE ifrogz Flex Arc Xiaomi MI Sport
Active Noise Cancelling Yes -
REMOTE CONTROL ifrogz Flex Arc Xiaomi MI Sport
Controls Volume, answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track -
BATTERY AND CHARGING ifrogz Flex Arc Xiaomi MI Sport
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable Headphone battery rechargeable
Battery Capacity - 100 mAh
Battery Life 8 hour(s) 7 hour(s) ifrogz Flex Arc lasts longer on a single charge than the Xiaomi MI Sport.
Standby Time - 280 hours
OTHERS ifrogz Flex Arc Xiaomi MI Sport
Included Accessories - 5 pairs of ear tips
Other projects: