ifrogz Flex Arc vs. RHA MA390 Wireless

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

In depth comparison and review of ifrogz Flex Arc and RHA MA390 Wireless. Compare design, audio features, functions and other important specifications to easily choose the right headphones for you. Our goal is to help you uncover differences between the products and find the headphones that will best fit your needs.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

ifrogz Flex Arc vs. RHA MA390 Wireless Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS ifrogz Flex Arc RHA MA390 Wireless
Product Type Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Weight - 24 g
Colour Black | White -
Protection Sweat-resistant Sweat-resistant, water-resistant
Recommended Use Portable electronics -
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 10 m -
SOUND QUALITY ifrogz Flex Arc RHA MA390 Wireless
Headphones Form Factor In-ear - behind-the-neck mount In-ear
Headphones Technology - Dynamic
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 4.1 Bluetooth 4.1 Both headphones have the same Bluetooth version.
Noise Isolating - Yes RHA MA390 Wireless are equipped with a noise isolating function.
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Frequency Response - 16 - 22000 Hz
Diaphragm 8 mm -
Features - Bluetooth aptX technology
MICROPHONE ifrogz Flex Arc RHA MA390 Wireless
Active Noise Cancelling Yes -
REMOTE CONTROL ifrogz Flex Arc RHA MA390 Wireless
Controls Volume, answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track 3-button remote
BATTERY AND CHARGING ifrogz Flex Arc RHA MA390 Wireless
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable Headphone battery rechargeable
Battery Life 8 hour(s) 8 hour(s) Both headphones last the same amount of time on a single charge.
Standby Time - 720 hours
OTHERS ifrogz Flex Arc RHA MA390 Wireless
Included Accessories - Carrying pouch, USB charging cable, 3 pairs of ear tips (small, medium, large)
Service & Support - Limited warranty - 3 years
Other projects: