AKG K92 vs. RIG 500HS CAMO

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

In depth comparison and review of AKG K92 and RIG 500HS CAMO. Compare design, audio features, functions and other important specifications to easily choose the right headphones for you. Our goal is to help you uncover differences between the products and find the headphones that will best fit your needs.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

AKG K92 vs. RIG 500HS CAMO Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS AKG K92 RIG 500HS CAMO
Product Type Headphones - wired - 3.5 mm jack Headset - wired
Weight 200 g -
Colour Matte black Arctic white camo
Earpad Material Leatherette -
Recommended Use Professional audio Game console
SOUND QUALITY AKG K92 RIG 500HS CAMO
Headphones Form Factor Full size Full size
Headphones Technology - Dynamic
Ear Cups Type Closed -
Adjustable Headband - Yes
Connectivity Technology Wired Wired
Noise Isolating Yes Yes Both headphones are equipped with noise isolation.
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Frequency Response 16 - 22000 Hz 20 - 20000 Hz AKG K92 offer a larger frequency range than RIG 500HS CAMO.
Max Input Power 200 mW 40 mW
Sensitivity 113 dB 111 dB AKG K92 have higher sensitivity than RIG 500HS CAMO.
Impedance 32 Ohm 32 Ohm
Diaphragm 40 mm 40 mm Both headphones are designed with same thick diaphragm.
MICROPHONE AKG K92 RIG 500HS CAMO
Type - Boom
Frequency Response - 100 - 10000 Hz
Audio Input Details - Uni-directional
Sensitivity - -45 dBV/Pascal
Signal-To-Noise Ratio - 42 dB
CABLE AKG K92 RIG 500HS CAMO
Cable Type Headphones cable - 3 m Headset cable - 1.3 m
CONNECTIONS AKG K92 RIG 500HS CAMO
Connector Type Headphones (mini-phone stereo 3.5 mm) Headset (mini-phone stereo 3.5 mm 4-pole)
OTHERS AKG K92 RIG 500HS CAMO
Included Accessories 3.5 mm to 6.3 mm adapter -
Other projects: